Similarities:
- All provide network security and firewall protection
- Offer VPN capabilities for remote access
- Include features like intrusion prevention and content filtering
Differences:
- Management approach: SonicWall and Fortigate use traditional on-premises management, while Cisco/Meraki is cloud-managed
- Pricing structure: Cisco/Meraki requires ongoing subscriptions, others have more flexible licensing options
- Feature depth: Fortigate and SonicWall tend to offer more advanced configuration options compared to Meraki’s simplified approach.
Top Pros:
SonicWall:
- Strong performance-to-price ratio
- Comprehensive security features
- Flexible deployment options
Fortigate:
- Excellent throughput and performance
- Robust security capabilities
- Integrated SD-WAN functionality
Cisco/Meraki:
- Easy cloud-based management
- Simplified configuration for non-experts
- Seamless integration with other Meraki products
Top Cons:
SonicWall:
- User interface can be complex for beginners
- Some advanced features require additional licensing
- Support quality can be inconsistent
Fortigate:
- Initial setup can be challenging
- Licensing model can be confusing
- Some features require paid subscriptions
Cisco/Meraki:
- Ongoing subscription costs required
- Limited advanced configuration options
- Network goes down if subscription lapses